RFK Jr.’s former running mate is publicly expressing disapproval of President Donald Trump’s choice for surgeon general, Casey Means, and raising questions about the autonomy of the HHS secretary in decision-making processes.
Nicole Shanahan, a philanthropist and advocate, shared her concerns on social media, highlighting discrepancies between the promised qualifications of appointees and the actual selections made. Shanahan’s comments shed light on the perceived influence on decisions within the HHS, raising speculation about external influences.
Calley Means and Make America Healthy Again
Calley Means, an ally of the Kennedy family, is actively involved in the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement initiated by RFK Jr. The movement aims to address chronic diseases and promote public health through non-corporate avenues.
The nomination of Casey Means follows the withdrawal of Janette Nesheiwat’s nomination amid controversies surrounding her medical education. Criticisms from various quarters, including conservative figures like Laura Loomer, have underscored the ideological alignments sought in appointees to health-related positions.
Response to Trump’s New Pick
Loomer’s dissatisfaction with both Nesheiwat and Means reflects a broader sentiment among some supporters of President Trump. The questioning of Means’ suitability by individuals within Trump’s circle indicates diverging opinions on health initiatives and their implementation.
Trump, in his endorsement of Casey Means, emphasized her credentials in advancing the MAHA agenda and her collaborative efforts with RFK Jr. This endorsement further solidifies the commitment to combatting chronic diseases through innovative approaches.
Continued Support and Critique
Despite past differences, Shanahan remains a vocal advocate for RFK Jr.’s work at the HHS, underscoring the importance of continuity in health policy. Her willingness to challenge dissenting voices within political spheres demonstrates a steadfast commitment to the principles underpinning the MAHA movement.
The absence of official responses from the HHS regarding Shanahan’s remarks leaves room for speculation on the dynamics shaping decision-making processes within the department.
