A federal judge’s ruling late Monday in the 2024 North Carolina Supreme Court race is a significant win for Democratic incumbent Allison Riggs. The decision by U.S. District Judge Richard Myers upholds the inclusion of disputed ballots in the final count, potentially securing Riggs’ electoral victory over Republican challenger Jefferson Griffin.
Legal Battle Overview
The legal dispute centered on the removal of potentially ineligible voter ballots following orders by state appeals courts. Judge Myers deemed the removal of votes post-Election Day unconstitutional, citing violations of due process and equal protection rights.
Key Decisions
Myers directed the State Board of Elections to certify the election results, showing Riggs as the winner by a slim margin of 734 votes after two recounts. However, the judge granted a seven-day delay for potential appeals by Griffin to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
The ruling prohibits the implementation of state court orders removing ballots and mandates certification based on the initial tally at the end of the canvassing period.
Reactions and Implications
While Riggs expressed confidence in the legal outcome, Griffin’s campaign is evaluating further steps in response to the ruling. The decision has broader implications for election integrity and the interpretation of voting laws.
Griffin’s challenges to the election results raised concerns about retroactive changes to voting laws and selective disenfranchisement. Myers emphasized the importance of setting clear rules before elections to maintain public trust in the electoral process.
Future Implications
The ongoing legal battle underscores the significance of upholding election rules and protecting voter rights. The outcome of the North Carolina Supreme Court race could have long-term implications for the state’s judicial landscape and political dynamics.
