A federal judge has for the second time invalidated President Donald Trump’s attempt to penalize a law firm by revoking its government business privileges.
U.S. District Judge John D. Bates ruled on Friday that the executive order aimed at Jenner & Block violates constitutional protections of speech and right-to-counsel and cannot be legally enforced.
Legal Challenges
Bates’ decision, appointed by President George W. Bush, mirrors a previous ruling in favor of Perkins Coie law firm, challenging Trump’s actions against perceived adversarial law firms.
“This order, akin to others, aims to impede legal representation disfavored by the administration, shielding the Executive Branch from essential judicial oversight,” Bates articulated.
Roots of Dispute
Trump’s focus on Jenner & Block stemmed from Andrew Weissmann, a former member involved in investigating Trump’s Russia connections during the 2016 election. Weissmann, no longer with the firm since 2021, has been a vocal Trump critic and legal analyst on MSNBC during Trump’s legal battles.
The executive order instructed federal agencies to terminate contracts, revoke security clearances, and restrict access to federal premises for Jenner & Block. Bates highlighted the dilemma it posed for the firm between upholding constitutional rights and sustaining their business.
Jenner & Block’s Response
Jenner & Block commended the verdict, denouncing the executive order as an “unconstitutional assault” on the firm.
“This ruling underscores the vital role of attorneys in advocating for clients and the law,” the firm stated.
The Department of Justice’s response to a potential appeal remains uncertain at this stage.
