Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) — two lawmakers with very different views and priorities on most issues — united to criticize President Donald Trump’s airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities.
The Lack of Congressional Briefing
Khanna and Massie expressed concerns on CBS’ “Face the Nation” about the lack of Congressional briefing before the military action, which they deemed unconstitutional. They introduced a resolution to block U.S. involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict.
Constitutional Concerns
Khanna emphasized the need for Congress to be briefed before any war decision and to vote on it. He highlighted the push for regime change in Iran and urged for a more cautious approach.
Massie pointed out that there was no imminent threat to the U.S., questioning the authorization for the strike. He criticized the lack of Congressional involvement in the decision-making process.
Speaker’s Response
House Speaker Mike Johnson defended the President’s actions, citing constitutional authority. Massie found this explanation puzzling, given the absence of a direct threat to the U.S.
Public Opinion and Political Alignments
Despite initial debates, the majority of the MAGA base supported the airstrikes, highlighting the complexities of public opinion on military actions in the Middle East.
Long-Term Consequences
Both Khanna and Massie emphasized the enduring impact of overseas wars on Americans, calling for a reevaluation of U.S. military interventions and their aftermath.
