Former solicitors general from various administrations are at the forefront of opposing President Donald Trump’s actions against the legal profession. Recent developments have seen prominent legal figures speaking out against Trump’s executive orders that aim to penalize law firms.
Standing Up Against Executive Orders
Elizabeth Prelogar, a solicitor general under former President Joe Biden, emphasized the importance of holding the executive branch accountable during a recent address at Harvard Law School. She highlighted the crucial role of the legal system in addressing such challenges.
Two former solicitors general, Donald Verrilli and Paul Clement, have actively contested Trump’s orders in court. Verrilli, appointed by former President Barack Obama, represents Susman Godfrey, while Clement, appointed by former President George W. Bush, advocates for WilmerHale. These firms are challenging Trump’s directives that restrict their government contracts, security clearances, and interactions with government officials.
While some law firms have chosen to cooperate with the president, others have opted to confront his actions. Former solicitors general play a pivotal role in advocating for the rule of law amidst these challenges.
Defending the Rule of Law
The solicitor general, often referred to as the “tenth justice,” serves as the top legal representative of the Justice Department before the Supreme Court. Their actions significantly influence the court’s docket and decisions.
Verrilli has been particularly active in challenging Trump’s orders, rallying support from numerous law firms to oppose what he deems as a threat to the rule of law. He describes the president’s actions as an unprecedented assault on the judiciary.
Clement, known for his commitment to upholding legal principles, filed a lawsuit on behalf of WilmerHale following an executive order targeting the firm. His actions underscore the importance of defending the separation of powers and the independence of the judiciary.
Stalwart Advocates for Justice
Clement’s history of defending legal principles dates back to his decision to resign from a major law firm in 2011 over a controversial case. His stance reflects a dedication to upholding the integrity of legal representation, even in the face of opposition.
The involvement of former solicitors general in challenging the Trump administration’s actions highlights the enduring commitment to upholding the rule of law and safeguarding the legal profession’s integrity.
