Democrats on the House intelligence panel criticized top Trump administration officials during a hearing for denying the presence of classified information in their Signal chat about strikes on Yemen.
The messages, disclosed by The Atlantic, detailed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s communication on planned strikes hours before they occurred. Lawmakers pressed spy chiefs on classification rules and the nature of classified information.
Classification of Information
Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi referenced classification guidelines, highlighting the potential secrecy of military plans and operations discussed. The discussion overshadowed the scheduled threats hearing.
Democratic Pushback
Multiple officials, including Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe, denied discussing classified information. Rep. Jim Himes questioned Gabbard’s assertions from a previous hearing.
Rep. Joaquin Castro challenged NSA Director Gen. Timothy Haugh on classifying similar information from Russia. Castro emphasized the sensitivity of such data if intercepted.
Contentious Exchanges
Rep. Jimmy Gomez accused Ratcliffe and Gabbard of misleading statements, prompting strong rebuttals. Rep. Chrissy Houlahan expressed frustration over diverted focus from critical issues like bioterrorism.
Despite denials of discussing specific weapons systems, officials faced criticism for evading responsibility. Democratic efforts extended beyond the hearing to inquiries into Signal usage by administration officials.
The dispute underscores tensions over transparency and accountability within the Trump administration, drawing sharp rebukes from Democratic lawmakers.
